Yes, @akanter, there was some really good discussion - and it’s not over!
Key points and action items are below. There are now more detailed notes and if you want to listen to the whole thing, here is a link to the recording.
Key Points
Technical Priorities
- A core set of common priorities emerged from the ranking survey.
- For strategic discussions, this is more about ranking the discussion topics in terms of priority.
- There are many in the community who want a full EMR solution/product. Working on something that large may not be the best use of the TAC
- A way to balance this may be to focus on the core and enabling collaboration on the broader EMR functionality that the community wants
- The TAC needs to define what is meant by core
DIAL Catalytic Grant
- No clear scopes emerged that can be done for $15k.
- Consider submitting for assistance with an interoperability strategy.
GSoC
We didn’t get far into this, but @mseaton posed some great questions:
- Do we want to propose projects according to the technical priorities, the technical roadmap?
- What about @ssmusoke’s proposal for an HIV distribution?
Action Items
- Publish the rankings to the broader community for additional review/feedback
- Review the items and indicate what they consider core
@mksd @ibacher @mseaton @dkayiwa, please chime in with anything that you’d like to call out or clarify.