The Sync2 sprint for UgandaEMR ended Monday 5th.08.2019 albeit having not finished up all the tickets of the sprint within the given sprint time period. However, we have scheduled a retrospective meeting for Tuesday 6th.08.2019 at 3:00pm EAT.
hello @odorajonathan thanks for this information but i think it was given on a short notice, can you please let us know what came out from the meeting ??
Apologies @mozzy if it was such a short notice, I haven’t yet got access to have the conference call recordings but for now on the sprint wiki is an etherpad note I posted, under the retrospective section.
You could have a look at that as I get the call recording. We may as well have another meeting later on about the same where most of us are involved including @dkayiwa and @ssmusoke for better technical advice and a clearer way forward
well , one challenge i have seen ,.
The tickets are entirely descibed from user’s case point of view , and completely no techical guidance or expectation is given.
i have done some work but it seems @ssmusoke is temporarily in a ahideout , like i havent seen his comments yet on the Prs i raised and some techinical questions i asked.
Yes that is a problem many are/were facing and as far as am concerned we are waiting for any technical info or support so we can have a way forward with this.
Hey @odorajonathan , what is the way forward with the sprint ,was it ended??
Am seeing the devs arent actively working on the tickets. The few tickets worked , no reviews at all.
any update on this ??
cc @odorajonathan@dkayiwa@ssmusoke
@mozzy A sprint takes two weeks and it closes with a retrospective meeting, which we had. I think what we have to do is prepare for a new sprint with more devs on board so that we can have the sprint a success within the two weeks.
@odorajonathan I think it is best to secure time from a couple of dev/3 and higher to help with the sprint and provide technical support as it goes forward. Unfortunately I only have bandwidth to play product owner role
@ssmusoke OK! Once we are able to have their participation, we can have the sprint going again. However, how may we involve more higher devs seems to me they get busier by the day?
@odorajonathan Can you be a bit more clear on the type of assistance you need for the Dev 3 and 4? Maybe you can share where your team has reached and what blockers you are facing?
I am happy to work with you on Uberconference to write this up to share with the community?
@c.antwi The issues that need to be resolved require significant understanding of the OpenMRS Architecture, Web Services and FHIR (from what I understand), to guide the decisions being made to fill out the functionality so that it is useable in the field.
The first sprint fell into issues, as the team needed to be guided on the technical areas.
I hope that provides additional context from a product owner perspective