@marslan8530 will have a look
1 Like
hey @c.antwi can we schedule a conference call in upcoming days this week?
@marslan8530 can we still go with Thursdayâs 8pm EAT as the REST API Team did last week , is that ok with you ?
@tendomart this means 5pm UTC right?
1 Like
@ball @dkayiwa @c.antwi @jennifer @jwnasambu could you be having inputs on how we can best help @marslan8530 to get passed this blocker that he is facing?
Did you take a look at the links for Testers and Subject Matter Experts?
A Tester can be an expert in the subject matter of Testing. Any subject matter expert can be a volunteer and is a contributor. What do you find misleading on the tester information page? What is out dated for subject matter experts?
Hey @dkayiwa For non-technical users, people interested in testing OpenMRS may be taken somewhat as a trail version before the actual implementation. Thatâs what i reffed to while saying âmisleadingâ
And as you said âtester can be an expert in subject matter of testingâ and âany subject matter expert is a volunteerâ so my point is we should arrange all these information for persona(s) and page intended for volunteers. Separate categorizing upfront should be done between contributors, service provider or implementer, new users and other personas we have developed. Then we can sub-divide.
Regarding Outdated information, information for someone who is interested in translating or documentation should be details of projects weâre looking to work on and suggestions if they intend on working on some problem they found them self. Weâve classified and given details of âClinical Content Expertsâ and so on. I donât get the logic behind this. On page next to this Documentation review work needed we havenât mentioned type of expert needed for a task which makes this page awkward.
I may be missing out on something as i donât know much about OMRS as you people do. That is why iâm asking for enlightenment.
This is not correct. Not all subject matter experts are volunteers.
Everyone who does something is a contributor, regardless of whether you are a volunteer or not.
Can you update the information which you think is out dated?
My suggestion is that you start with only those that you understand. Then we can continue to discuss and refine those that you do not.
How would you state this to make it clearer?
@marslan8530 Iâve looked at one Org on the list you have provided , but their Doc is not very user friendly , the rest are however fine.
@marslan8530 ya right , hope @c.antwi has confirmed , right after the Operations Call.
Yes, as per my understanding. But i wanted your suggestion regarding objections Iâve raised but by the looks of it, you seem to be pretty okay with the information present there and as you have more interactions and experience within the community. So iâd just work on IA and leave the information as it is for now
okay.
Iâll just look for a suitable place for this information for now as per your suggestion. Information inside can be edited afterwards
Iâm fine. Lets wait for @c.antwi if sheâs available to confirm
@tendomart yes, there are some which are outdated, some which are decent and some good. Iâll use all for comparison nonetheless. Thanks for your input
1 Like
Actually Navigation and content composition were my hinderance as a first time visitor, spent over 10 minutes trying to look for developer resources without success.
1 Like
Hahaha 
maybe you looked at VistA
No i actually found trouble at Open Dentalâs Documentation , not withstanding though , i loved their pictures.
Oh okay. If you want to tell me more about it, you may make a personal thread. Iâd love to hear your feedback
Iâd like to join the call on Thursday - and I have a conflict with 5pm UTC. Can we possibly move it to 1pm or 1:30pm UTC?
1 Like
oops seen this late. Unfortunately i have not heard from @c.antwi @jennifer are you still available that time ?
Lets wait for @c.antwi to be back and we can decide then