@akanter you mean that a tetanus vaccine regular dose and tetanus vaccine booster would in fact be defined by two different concepts? Two concepts coded with different CVX codes? And it is by looking at the CVX code that we in fact know whether it is a dose or booster?
If yes, is this an international standard? I’m asking because it seems to be from the CDC.
It looks like we have a use case that will require to be flexible at runtime. Can we use an ‘other vaccine’ concept and, instead of introducing an ‘IMMUNIZATIONS NON-CODED’ obs (cfr here), we would introduce an ‘additional details’ field (“à la conditions”, see here)?