So, trying to think through how to answer Andy’s question above, maybe we should think about revising how the Medication resource works because we’re basically ignoring the drug table name field. Perhaps for Medication we should just be returning the name in the code field instead? (In FHIR coded fields can be real coded answers, but they also could just be a string display). That seems to reflect how the CIEL drug table and the PIH drug table work. We could then attach the actual concept as an (OpenMRS-specific) extension. (Since the drug name and concept describe two slightly different things and there’s only one code allowed, it would seem inappropriate to lump them both into the same coding as that would imply the concept === the drug).