Defining our concept validation rules for OCL

[ibacher (Ian Bacher)]

@burke

My initial reaction is that we should only consider non-retired concepts when applying the “unique fully-specified names” constraint. This way, you could import the CIEL concept and would only be forced to rename your concept if you decided to un-retire it later on.

I believe this is the validation logic we actually enforce in OMRS, i.e., we don’t consider either retired names or names of retired concepts in reporting duplicate name exceptions.