mseaton
(Mike Seaton)
March 28, 2025, 1:54pm
9
Anecdotally, this conversation from back in 2007 / 2008 is still very relevant and pretty much everything we hoped to do here never happened, as far as I know:
Continuing discussions from:
Sync 2.0 Planning
http://notes.openmrs.org/2018-03-28-Design-Forum
EVNT-36
Brief summary: the Atom Feed module built for Sync 2 copy/pasted code from the Event module, because the asynchronous-after-the-transaction event delivery provided by that module wasn’t sufficient. Therefore we’ve been trying to figure out how to make the Event module support the Atom Feed use case.
Taking a step back, I think there are two general use cases that we should be seeking to ad…