Okay. How about something that covers more use cases than retiring concepts? I’m thinking of something like “REPLACES”. We already have “MOVED FROM” and “WAS A”… maybe using one of those would be better (e.g., “MOVED FROM”) to avoid having to introduce a completely new map type. We’re going to need to ensure code used to look up concepts via SAME-AS mapping will still work for this new map type (e.g., finding a concept from a mapping in a form or report).
@mogoodrich does PIH still maintain a “gold” dictionary server? If so, could you give me a dump of concept IDs + UUID + fully specified name from that server? I could use it to estimate the “official” PIH codes for most concepts while we’re testing & working through the details.